The fundamentals below still hold, but the hardware has moved on twice since we ran these tests. Here is the short version for 2026.
Photoshop still rewards a fast processor over a big one. Most tools use one or a few cores, so a modern Core Ultra 5 or Ryzen 5 with high clock speeds feels quick for everyday retouching. Lightroom Classic is different: exports, previews and AI Denoise spread across every core you have and lean heavily on the graphics card, so photographers with large catalogues benefit from a Core Ultra 7 or 9, or a Ryzen 9, paired with a current RTX card.
Memory matters more than it did. Generative and AI features hold far more in RAM, so 32GB is the sensible starting point for RAW work and 64GB for medium format or large panoramas.
Our photography range is built on exactly this split: entry and value systems on fast six and ten core processors, performance and high end systems on Core Ultra 7 and 9, and Ryzen 9 options where batch processing dominates.
Most people think of the processor in your computer as its brain but I like to think of a modern processor being more like a factory. You have data going in, some work being undertaken to that data in the processor via some calculations giving some output. The faster it can undertake calculations, the faster your computer will feel to use and the faster it will be able to complete the set tasks. Modern processors are divided into a number of processor cores. One processor core is essentially like one factory production line. By adding more cores, it is possible to undertake the same process in parallel many times over and get more output from your factory. Processor cores are quite versatile, they can undertake entirely different tasks or they can all undertake a portion of the same task.
Some tasks are easy to divide out amongst many processor cores but other tasks are more difficult and only work with one processor core. We refer to these tasks as being single threaded (only works on one core) or multi-threaded (works on many cores in parallel).
A processor Clock speed is usually measured in GHz (billions of pulses per second). Each pulse represents the ability of the processor to perform an instruction or part of an instruction. Usually, the faster the processor clock speed, the faster it will undertake a given task. Photoshop performance scales directly with processor clock speed. Some processors also include a feature called Turbo Boost. This refers to Intel Turbo Boost Technology which will try to increase the clock speed of the processors cores where safe to do so.
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology accelerates processor performance for peak loads, automatically allowing processor cores to run faster than the rated operating frequency if they’re operating below power, current, and temperature specification limits. Whether the processor enters into Intel® Turbo Boost Technology and the amount of time the processor spends in that state depends on the workload and operating environment.
To maximise performance under Turbo Boost, the majority of our photography systems use a high performance CPU cooler. Regular CPU coolers won’t allow the CPU to operate under Turbo speeds for long before reaching maximum temperature.
If the computer is mainly used for Photoshop and Lightroom it is important to understand how efficiently these applications cope with multi core processors. In order to understand this, we have undertaken testing using a range of processors from quad core right through to the huge 24 core variants. We were quickly able to conclude that both Photoshop and Lightroom are not able to take advantage of a great number of processor cores. Other applications such as On1 Photo Raw and Topaz Photo AI make better use of multi core processors.
There are some exceptions as certain effects will have a small benefit given additional cores. On average however, we can conclude that it would be more beneficial to use a processor with fewer cores but higher processor frequency. The performance of the processors scale in a linear fashion with increased processor frequency. Modern processors tend to provide high core counts along with high processor frequency but where there is a desire to keep costs down, it will often be better to choose a top of the range Core i5 with high clock speed than an entry i7 which may have lower clock speed but more cores.
The best efficiency is gained from six core processors. We understand that most users will likely have other applications such as email, web browsers and various background tasks operating at the same time. Moving to a 10 core processor will effectively give the user 4 spare cores to run other applications and 10 core parts usually have a higher clock speed too. The only reason to consider a higher core product is due to a higher CPU clock speed usually present on these CPUs. Also pay attention to the CPU model numbers as they indicate the age of the item. At time of writing this article, Intel are on to their 13th generation processors so all these part numbers begin with 13. The i7-13700K for example is their 13th generation i7 and with each generation there are improvements and efficiencies in the CPU cores which make them faster than the previous generation. The improvements for photography use can be over 10% per generation so be wary of bargains on older gen chips.
A performance photography PC requires a processor able to handle the multitude of Photoshop actions and effects quickly and efficiently. Photoshop can efficiently utilise multiple processor cores, but efficiency drops off after two cores, with the four-core processor only being around 25% faster than the two-core at the same clock speed. The six-core processor is approximately 8% faster than a four-core.
Performance in Photoshop does improve directly with increases in processor clock speed, the higher, the better. Also the newer the generation of the CPU, the better. It is, therefore often better to utilise a newer generation Core i3 rather than an older core i5 processor if budget is limited. If you use the PC for a variety of tasks including video editing and image processing, you may still benefit from higher core counts from the other applications.
| CPU | CPU Performance |
| Intel Core i9-13900KS | 100% |
| Intel Core i9-13900KF | 97% |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | 97% |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | 97% |
| Intel Core i9-13900F | 91% |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | 86% |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D | 84% |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900 | 83% |
| Intel Core i7-13700KF | 82% |
| Intel Core i7-13700F | 77% |
| Intel Core i9-12900KF | 75% |
| AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | 73% |
| Intel Core i5-13600KF | 73% |
| AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | 72% |
| Intel Core i9-12900F | 71% |
| AMD Ryzen 7 7700 | 69% |
| Intel Core i7-12700KF | 68% |
| AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | 67% |
| Intel Core i5-13500 | 66% |
| AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | 64% |
| Intel Corei7-12 700F | 64% |
| AMD Ryzen 5 7600 | 61% |
| Intel Core i5-12600KF | 61% |
| Intel Core i5-13400F | 57% |
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | 57% |
| Intel Core i9-11900KF | 55% |
| AMD Ryzen 7 5700X | 55% |
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D | 54% |
| Intel Core i7-11700KF | 53% |
| AMD Ryzen 7 5700G | 52% |
| Intel Core i5-12500 | 52% |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 50% |
| Intel Core i5-12400F | 50% |
| Intel Core i7-11700F | 49% |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600 | 49% |
| Intel Core i5-11600KF | 48% |
| Intel Core i3-13100F | 48% |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600G | 47% |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5500 | 45% |
| Intel Core i3-12100F | 45% |
| Intel Core i5-11400F | 43% |
| AMD Ryzen 5 4600G | 38% |
| AMD Ryzen 5 4500 | 38% |
| AMD Ryzen 3 4300G | 33% |
| Intel Core i3-10105F | 32% |
When we first wrote this guide, Intel held a clear lead in per-core speed for Photoshop. That gap has closed. AMD’s Ryzen 9000 processors now match Intel in single-core work and lead in heavily multi-threaded tasks such as Lightroom exports, which is why our range includes both platforms. Choose Intel Core Ultra for the widest range of configurations, or Ryzen 9 where export speed and rendering matter most.
SKU: 5060959093930